In several places on this site we show the same kind of number: how much money goes into one unit of service delivered. Cost per resolved case, cost per kilometre, cost per hospital case. The rules behind them are set out here once.
The number is cost per unit of service delivered: money divided by units delivered. It is not an outcome. A "resolved case" does not mean a justly resolved case; a "hospital case" does not mean a cured patient; a kilometre of road does not mean a safe road. Paying for outcomes ties money to measured change in people's lives — cost per unit is a far more modest thing.
Numerator and denominator must cover the same thing. The courts' budget is divided by the courts' cases — not the whole judiciary's budget, which quietly folds tens of millions of euro of prosecution money into the cost of one court case. The mistake is invisible in the result: the number looks plausible, it is simply wrong by a constant factor.
When the units are not alike, a raw average means nothing. A hospital case can be dialysis at €25 or a transplant at €20,000. Comparison between institutions is therefore made against the expected cost for their own case mix. Where no such adjustment is possible, no between-institution comparison is published.
Each number is computed where its data lives, and carries its own scope:
Health has no such tile yet. Nationally the number is computable — about €586 per case for 2025 — but comparison between hospitals requires a case-mix adjustment and is therefore not published.
There is no cross-sector "efficiency index". Cost per case, cost per kilometre and cost per hospital case are not commensurable; averaging them would manufacture a number corresponding to nothing. The family is a shared method, not a shared scale.
See also the judiciary, the sectors and why Bulgaria does not pay for outcomes.